Off we went at 8am down
the 11km car-battering feeder road that connects the school to the
main road from India to Thimphu. It's a miracle cars survive more
than a month on these ripped up rough and stony tracks that have been
gouged miraculously out of the side of the mountains. Phuensaling is
another 46km away down a remarkably twisty-turny, back and forth,
precipitous jungle road. It cries out for a motorbike and a sunny
day. Can I justify buying a bike? The freedom would be immense. Risk
factors would magnify.
Phuensaling is
different. It's a border town. It's got the edgy feel that border
towns have and a fence that cuts right through the middle of town
like The Wall in old Berlin. One side is India, the other Bhutan. I
can't go into India because of the visa situation, but it seems that
at this particular delineation of states, restrictions are...
flexible. My principal assured me that curtains are cheaper in India,
so to India we went with the assurance that we could always 'talk' if
there was a problem. So I went to India. Twice. In one day. Bizarre.
And for curtains, of all things. In the gatehouses, the military were
idling and asked no questions of the parade of faces that passed by
them. Not even mine, and I guarantee it, mine stood out. No tourist
would come here unless he was overlanding to the heart of Bhutan, in
which case they'd be going full pelt because it takes so long to get
anywhere here. They don't measure miles; they measure days.
The differences between
India and Bhutan were huge and immediately in your face. The cows in
India, for one, plodding sacredly around the markets. The
shop-keepers. The variety of goods. The beggars. The destitute. This
difference slapped me sideways, though I should perhaps have expected
it.
Whilst waiting for my
principal to finish buying shoes, a young woman and three children
approached me, all filthy in rags and hungry looking. One of the kids
had sores of an indeterminate nature erupting from his 5 year old
face. I'd already had young children clutching my arm or holding my
leg insistently, their faces desperate. And the crutchless guy with
the amputated leg rolling through the sea of feet wit his begging
bowl. I was absorbing India when the family approached me, just
standing there like there's a culture-hose on me and letting it smack
me in the face until I got used to the pressure. I try not to give
money to beggars, but I''d never been faced with such destitution, so
I reached into my pocket without thinking twice and pulled out 20
Ngultrum. I confess I was pleased it was neither bigger nor smaller
than that sum, but I later found out it was a fortune of charity.
Once she had it, the mother took the child with the erupting growths
by the hair and pulled his head back so I could see his torn up face
more clearly and told me there was no doctor for the child. 'No
doctor.' The child's face was pressed towards me, not violently, but
necessarily. I was the big target. The walking ATM, and I'd already
spilt some cash.
I thought many things
during the ten minutes or so that I stood there waiting for my
principle to finish buying shoes, with this desperate family in
determined attendance throughout. I thought about how little would be
required to lift them for even a short amount of time out of their
struggle. Hunger is brutal and unforgiving. I thought about how
little even a thousand Ngultrum would really do to change their
circumstances. Any charity would be alleviative at best, palliative
at worst. I thought about how many of these broken people there were
in India and how quickly my pockets would be drained if I started
opening them with serious intent.
When I was
surface-grappling with the inevitable questions that India's brutal
society raises, I remembered the story of Gautama and it made sense
that his enlightenment had its origins in India. When Siddhartha left
his palace to find the real world, he found these people and worse,
the destitute, the cripples, the hungry, the filthy, desperate and
dying. He realised that their unabated struggle and pain was not
exceptional to the human condition; it was vivid form of what is a
fundamental and universal aspect of the human condition –
suffering. This realisation prompted him to give up all the trappings
of comfort and security (tools for temporary respite of suffering) to
find a way to live with acceptance of the truth of suffering that was
at the same time neither unbearable nor depressing. Quite a
challenge.
In a knee-jerk reaction
that had its root in undefined guilt, I too felt the urge to throw
open my bag and let go my stupid possessions. All the junk I owned:
the laptop speakers; the ice gauntlet snow gloves; the smart shoes;
the climbing knife; the headtorch; the kindle; the mp3 player; the
hardrive; the 'stuff'. What value did any of them have in the face of
this suffering? Then I felt the anger. How dare you stand there and
make me accountable for the poverty that exists in the world? Who are
you to take the 20 Ngultrums I gave and consider it not an act of
charity but a free pass to press down harder and more unfairly on my
feelings. How dare you? And then... of course! I am the rich one,
standing here in my soft-shell trousers with my western complexion
and a bag full of stuff. What do I expect?
Looking away from the
family and back into India I thought: 'how dare the crowd flow by
these people like they're mere rocks in a river, slowly eroding them
with their indifference'. What is it in the Indian culture that makes
this scene possible? The caste system makes untouchables out of
people that are born innocent. Is it an extreme interpretation of
karmic reincarnation that allows for such indifference to suffering?
The dogs in Thailand are treated badly because they are considered to
be reincarnate ill-doers (the same belief is held in Bhutan but it
obliges them to be compassionate – the dogs here have a dignity
that they would never have in Thailand, even though the Butanese
would rather live without them).
The final thought I
had – this doesn't happen on the other side of the fence. The
family wouldn't be allowed to suffer in this condition in Bhutan. The
government wouldn't allow it. The people wouldn't allow it.
My trip to India shook
me up and set me thinking in unanswered questions:
At what point does
indifference become cruelty by consent? How is the systematic abuse
of the poor different to other crimes against humanity? How can
suffering to this degree be so institutionalised that it is no longer
visible when it's right in front of your face?
Poverty of this kind
and in this environment is dehumanising for both the poor and for the
indifferent witness of their poverty, but I fear this statement may
be a peculiarity of my middle-class western up-bringing that only
permits a narrow and cloistered appreciation of the prevalence of
poverty and of what it is to be human in this world.
The very last thought:
the children at my school should see this place. Everybody should.
Televised or reported poverty only exists in the mind – it isn't
felt. Everyone should hold that desperate woman's eyes as she
clutches at an arm and tells you that her disfigured and hungry child
has no doctor. Why? Because when I put my head down on my fluffy down
pillow it is still a truth of the world that she is there even if I
can't see her, and if I can do nothing to alleviate her suffering or
change the nature of life on this Earth, I can at least have
gratitude for the pillow beneath my head. If everyone was truly
grateful for something as simple as a pillow, a principle cause of
inequality might disappear.